60
Votes

Proactive execution of standard treatment plans to ease burden on patients

Why not encourage (ie. fund) care providers to be proactive in how they treat people. Here is my example (based on recent experience) - recently visited a walk-in clinic with a sore throat (I suspected strep throat). They took a swab, I waiting 6 days then needed to return for another appointment to find out my results and get another prescription.

Instead why could they not just ask which pharmacy to send a prescription to in case the results come back positive and pre-screen for things like allergies, concerns about taking antibiotics, etc. Upon receiving a positive result you can be notified by phone and the script can be sent directly to the pharmacy. Instead I have to leave work early - drive across town just to learn the shocking news that my swab is positive and for someone to hand me a piece of paper.

This is just one use care - but I'm sure there are likely hundreds more.

I have to admit I was inspired to post this after watching this entertaining TED talk:
http://www.ted.com/talks/rory_sutherland_sweat_the_small_stuff.html

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.